<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Electronic Discovery and Technology in Law</title>
	<link>http://www.eblawg.com</link>
	<description>eBlawg.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Using The Internet to Search for Experts</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Litigators can use the internet as a helpful tool for researching both potential experts and experts designated by opposing counsel. Simple search engine research can often lead to articles and websites featuring an expert. Blogging has become popular and a growing number of medical experts maintain their own websites that discuss the expert’s specialty. Blog [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2008/05/13/using-the-internet-to-search-for-experts/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Blog at Your Own Risk!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1
Social networking sites such as Friendster, MySpace and Facebook are becoming useful resources for employers. Although there is no case law on the subject, there is growing concern that disgruntled job applicants will allege discrimination in the hiring process if their online profile, blog, or chat log prevents them from securing a position.
Steven Rothberg, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/09/19/blog-at-your-own-risk/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cyber Harassment, Employer Immunity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The internet provides users greater avenues to exercise their First Amendment right to free speech. The “anonymity” of the internet allows individuals to express themselves using online pseudonyms. However, the same veil of anonymity can be used to harass or threaten others. Sometimes referred to as trolling, baiting or flaming, e-harassment runs rampant in internet [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/08/05/cyber-harassment-employer-immunity/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>VIDEO: About eBlawg</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
A legal blog published by Los Angeles litigation firm, Acker, Kowalick &#38; Whipple. The blog is maintained by the firm’s attorneys’ Vanessa Case and Leslie Burnet.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/06/13/video-about-eblawg/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Costs in Translation</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Who Bears the Cost of Translating Electronic Data Compilations?
Retrieval of e-mail from backup media for production in discovery may be costly and time consuming, raising the issue of whether and to what extent the demanding party must share in the expense associated with production of such information. In Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. v. Superior [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/04/25/costs-in-translation/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Trivia and Statistics</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The cost of e-discovery to corporate clients is estimated to soar from $40 million in 1999 to a $2.8 billion in 2007.
Source: Richard L. Marcus, E-Discovery &#38; Beyond: Toward Brave New World or 1984? 25 Rev. Litig. 633 (2006) (Citing Socha Consulting, The Socha-Gelbman 2005 Electronic Discovery Survey Results; Leigh Jones, The Surging Evolution of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/01/22/trivia-and-statistics/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Proposed Amendments to California Rule of Court 212</title>
		<description><![CDATA[California plans to update CRC 212 to mirror recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The changes were initially scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2007, were shelved indefinitely in the Summer of 2006. Much like the new FRCP Rules 16(f) and 26(b), the rules address the management of e-discovery during the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/01/18/proposed-amendments-to-california-rule-of-court-212/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is Metadata Discoverable?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Metadata may be discoverable, but there is no set rule regarding production of metadata. The courts take different approaches regarding production of cleaned data versus data in its native form.
In Hagenbuch v. 3B6 Sistemi Elettronici Industriali S.R.L, 2006 WL 665005 (N.D. Ill., Mar. 8 2006), the defendant permitted plaintiff to inspect its electronic records but [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/01/15/is-metadata-discoverable/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Anatomy of an e-mail</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The BODY, displays the e-mail message itself.
The HEADER appears at the top of the message. It usually contains: (1) the sender; (2) recipient(s); (3) the Subject Line; (4) the Carbon Copy line; and (5) possibly a Blind Carbon Copy line.
The information contained in the HEADER is readily accessible by the sender of the e-mail. A [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/01/11/anatomy-of-an-e-mail/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bit of Trivia</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The world&#8217;s first e-mail message was sent in late 1971 by Ray Tomlinson.
The first node of what would be dubbed ARPANET went live at UCLA on October 29, 1969. ARPANET was a precurser to today’s Internet.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.eblawg.com/2007/01/08/bit-of-trivia/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
